Fandom Antis

Probably the #1 thing you need to know about tumblr is this: It’s half social justice and queer theory, and half fandom. Fandom meaning teenagers and young adults who are enthusiastic fans of a TV show, book, movie, or other media. Fandom is about shipping (which characters should be couples), writing fanfic, drawing art, making memes and jokes, etc.

These two halves of tumblr exist hand in hand, side by side. The posts of a single blog may alternate between political outcries, and gifs from their favorite show.

One sizable difference between me and a lot of radfems my age is that it seems many of them are ex-fandom, whereas I’m currently in fandom. I’m actively read and write fanfic and I love it. Despite it’s flaws, fanfic is an artform that is not constrained or controlled by capitalism. Fanfic is dominated by women. Fanfic gives young writers a chance to practice writing. For that I will defend it to the bitter end.

When I heard that there was a link between radical feminism and “fandom antis” — and heard this not just from liberals but from a few radfems themselves — it was a “yikes” moment for me. Clearly this is not something all radical feminists indorse, but there does seem to be some correlation there.

In normal fandom culture, the only thing you’re really “allowed” to criticize people for is improper tagging. If proper tagging is being used, each individual is suppose to moderate for themselves what content they view. Everyone is basically allowed to do whatever they want, as long as they keep it out of sight, so that only people who are looking for it find it.

Antis breaks this rule. They harshly critique both fans and fanworks for being “problematic”.

In some ways, critiquing fandom is very much in keeping with general radical feminism: You can and should critique things, even if they’re something other people enjoy. And I basically agree that fandom is not above criticism.

But in the grand scheme of things, I really don’t think that non-commercial stories, written overwhelmingly by young women are a serious priority, no matter how “problematic” their content. I think that antis are mostly a biproduct of tumblr — the meeting of the site’s two greatest forces — rather than anything else.

In their most classic or stereotypical form, antis hurl vitriolic abuse at shippers and fic writers while not offering up any real argument. Fundamentally, antis don’t seem to actually be interested in changing people’s minds, if their rhetoric techniques are any indication. They don’t try to reason with people, or encourage them to look at other viewpoints. Their real goals seems not to be changing minds, but rather bullying those they disagree with into silence. That is not critique; that’s censorship.

Smutty Fanfic

Is fanfic porn? Not all fanfic is sexually explicit, yes, but a great deal of it is. But there are 2 key differences that set fanfic apart from porn.

First off, it’s written. There are no real human being acting out these acts.

Secondly, that these are familiar characters. These are not strangers, and they do not exist in isolation. This is sex with context; with social continuity; with caring.

While many people think fanfiction is about inserting sex into texts (like Tolkien’s) where it doesn’t belong, Brancher sees it differently: “I was desperate to read about sex that included great friendship; I was repurposing Tolkien’s text in order to do that. It wasn’t that friendship needed to be sexualized, it was that erotica needed to be … friendship-ized.” Many fanfiction writers write about sex in conjunction with beloved texts and characters not because they think those texts are incomplete, but because they’re looking for stories where sex is profound and meaningful. This is part of what makes fan fiction different from pornography: unlike pornography, fanfic features characters we already care deeply about, and who tend to already have long-standing and complex relationships with each other. It’s a genre of sexual subjectification: the very opposite of objectification. It’s benefits with friendship.

Francesca Coppa, “Introduction to The Dwarf’s Tale,” The Fanfiction Reader

Problematic

Antis are really big on 3 words: “pedophilia”, “incest”, and “abuse”. They throw these words around like they’re complete arguments, rather than single words. They are often unwilling to explain why something is harmful, as if is should be a given that requires no explanation and that providing an explanation is somehow capitulating.

Some advice here antis: yes, pedophilia harms children, but don’t just scream “IT’S PEDOPHILIA!!” Instead, go read The Trauma Myth by Susan Clancy, and come back and talk about it with specifics and nuance. Most children who are sexually abused by adults find the act itself confusing rather than traumatic. Some even consent or enjoy it. And yet there are a whole host of problems that show up in the years that follow.

Almost every single one of them reported that these experiences had damaged them: symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depression, drug and alcohol abuse, and sexual problems (ranging from lack of interest to inability to orgasm to hypersexuality) were extremely common. Of my sample, 75 percent reported self-esteem problems; 50 percent reported feeling cut off from others or alienated because of the abuse; and almost 90 percent reported difficulties in relationships.

The Trauma Myth by Susan Clancy, 2009

After those 3 big allegations, next on the cutting block is weird fantasy stuff that doesn’t exist in the real world. Fanfic has worlds were there are timers in people’s arms, counting down until they meet their soulmates. There’s male pregnancy. There’s A/B/O, a world were there is a sort of hormonal caste system an people sometimes go into heat and rationality goes out the window because of their raging hormones.

What if two people both look like young adults, but one actually is a young adult and the other is some immoral being that’s hundreds of years old. If they fall in love, is that okay, or do you object at that age gap? Are there troubling real-world implications? Or is the whole question moot because it pertains to immortal vampires, something which doesn’t exist in the real world?

Are you horny for the Beast in Beauty and the Beast? Is this bestiality? Does it matter, since the real world doesn’t have any shaggy men with human mind and mostly-humanoid bodies but with animal features?

These are the kinds of questions antis concern themselves with. These flow charts are satirical, but were all based on real things someone had heard antis say:

Simulacrum

One of the key and most heavily criticized features of this whole postmodernism woke culture that we see today is that everything is theory. We call talk to death about what is and isn’t okay in theory. But how does that translate into the real world? How does this idea function in practice?

Is “problematic” fanfic harmful? Not just could it theoretically be harmful — do we have evidence that it’s actually producing real-world harm?

I know of no actual studies which look into this question as specifically regards fanfiction. In the absence of any clear answer, there is only rhetoric. Fic writers insisting fic has no impact. Antis fear fic has a great impact, and talk about unlikely-sounding situations such as pedophiles printing out smutty fanfic of age-gap ships to use for grooming minors.

The one and only case that I know of where fic does seem to have a tangible and harmful impact on the real world is in the case of young women who read lots of fic about gay males, and this is the catalyst to them “discovering” that they themselves are gay trans men. This is a story you commonly hear both in the stories of women who have detransitioned, and in those who currently identify as trans men.

Writing stories about boys being in love with each other is one of the most innocuous things I can think of. And yet this is a cause behind young women cutting their breasts off, and harassing gay men for not having sex with them.

Whereas, if women with rape fantasies writing fics along those lines have caused any real world harm, I have yet to hear about it.

There is a disconnect between what is bad in theory, and what actually causes harm in the real-world. The relationship is not linear.

What do?

The only conclusion I have is that — if you actually want fanfic to have a more positive or receptive relationship to criticism — then these cease and desist orders have got to stop.

And this isn’t true just of fanfic. This is applicable to most areas, most topics!

Don’t order people to stop wearing makeup, or go vegetarian, or stop writing a certain kind of fanfic. Demanding that they stop isn’t going to yield positive results. Explain why the beauty industry, or factory farming, or BDSM is harmful, without making demands. If you don’t try to shame them or to dictate their behavior, you’ll find people more receptive to what you have to say. Just explain your idea, and let them decide how to implement this in their life on their own. Even if you don’t turn someone vegetarian, a polite approach might convince them to eat less meat, while an aggressive approach would likely cause them to double-down and rebuff you.

Lastly, no personal attacks. Personal attacks makes people not want to engage civilly or productively with you.

If you actually care about the issue in question, you should value effectiveness more than your self-righteous.

Forbidding ships will only increase people’s (especially minors’, who don’t take orders easily) interest in them. I’ve seen many posts (which I, sadly, didn’t save) where minors reacted aggressively when their favorite ship was being attacked, making it difficult to have a discussion on why some of these relationships are so bad in real life.

And it’s really sad, because antis do share valuable resources and discuss problematic topics that people don’t talk about (although they should). It’s thanks to the militant attitude of many antis that these ideas are generally ignored, because the focus is wrong.

Fiction vs Reality by Idris, 2016

Alienating Your Audience

Fandom overwhelming consists of the young and the female. If you want to see a mass feminist movement, these are the people you need to get on your side. And this is really why I’m most concerned about this anti/radfem association.

I worry that this fandom drama — which is ultimately of very little consequence on any sort of wide scale — will turn people against radfems. And then when it comes to an actually important, real-world issue, such as prostitutions, these spurned fic authors will be unwilling to listen. “Oh, them? They think everything is harmful.”

They use alarmist language so much it looses its meaning. If “incest” means Fred and George Weasley being in love, would a news headline that “incest is on the rise” cause any worry? Would you bother reading far enough to learn they’re actually talking about fathers raping their daughters? If you associate the phrase “child pornography” with a Voltron: Legendary Defender shipping war, then people aren’t going to take it as seriously when it comes underage girls on OnlyFans. It’s the boy who cried wolf.

Young ‘uns and these identities of theirs

Question: What is it about tumblr-type queer identities that the youth of today are so drawn to?

Hypothesis: Amidst a sea of motives, I believe the #1 reason is that it explains and legitimizes our teenage pain, and provides a framework to understand feelings of being “other.”


The older I get, the more I’ve come to understand that feeling “other” or “broken” is a nearly universal human experience. It is a chronic condition of humanity, but during one’s teen years it can be especially intense.

When I was 16 I read Smashed: Story of a Drunken Girlhood, a memoir by Koren Zailckas. If you look up Smashed on Goodreads, you’ll find a stream of people complaining that she’s whiny and melodramatic. I won’t say they’re wrong, but it’s because of that  —  not despite it  —  that the book really resonated with me. At 16, I was just beginning to outgrow my teenage misery, but it was still close at hand. Her description of how she felt as a teenager were poetic and visceral and absolutely rang true for me.

This passage in particular  —  describing a trip to the doctor after a knee injury  —  has always stayed with me:

He is pointing out exactly where on the X-ray board, where my bones are lit up like a slide show […] all I can think is, There is some mistake, that skeleton can’t possibly be mine. The bones are just too regular, like a stock photo from Gray’s Anatomy. I’d assumed that inside I’d look as dark and knotty as I feel. I was hoping the X-ray board could show me the injury I feel so deeply, a hurt that justifies the framework I’ve been using for living.

Smashed: Story of a Drunken Girlhood by Koren Zailckas

Reading this at 16 was when I first began to understand that much of my teenage angst which I had attributed to being a queer kid was not actually a direct product of that. Koren was a straight, gender-conforming, middle-class white girl with no particular trauma in her past. She had no explanation  —  no excuse  —  but she too felt this acute, soul-deep hurt.

This sentiment is one that I was reminded of again recently while watching a video a detrans woman discussing what lead her to conclude she was a trans man:

Growing up I always felt like something was wrong with me, and something was wrong in my brain. And so finding out that something could be wrong with me? Like oh my god, this is the answer! It was perfect, it ticked all the boxes for me.

“How My Personality Influenced My Identity” YouTube video by Elle Palmer

So many people feel internally broken as teenagers. It’s amorphous and vague, yet also so acute it’s almost tangible. Surely it must have some source, some explanation. Surely if a good clinician looked us over, they would find something actually, objectively, measurably wrong with us.

To some extent, the thing that actually is objectively, measurably wrong with us is our mental health. Most teenagers in this situation have dubious mental health at best. In my case, I was depressed, I had OCD, and  —  at one point  —  dabbled in anorexia. Yet I would not point to these things as the cause  —  I consider all these things to be symptoms of a fairly generic teenage malaise. Now, at 21, and all of these issues have cleared up on their own, while — at the time — nothing seemed to make much of a dent in them.

Of course, some kids are suffering from much more serious mental health issues, such as undiagnosed autism or genetically-based anxiety. Those kids need specified help. But to focus predominately on “mental health” is to miss the forest for the trees. Being a teenager  —  much like having your heart broken  —  is excruciatingly painful, but it is a pain better understood through a poetic framework than a pathological one.

All adults agree that being a teenager sucks, but to say “it sucks” is a massive understatement. What no one wants to say is that being a teenager is agonizing, that puberty is traumatic. For adults, that pain is in the rear-view mirror, and it’s all too easy to brush off. Smashed  —  in all its melodrama  —  was the first thing I’d ever seen that really articulated the full extent of it.

I think the biggest thing that would help is treating teenage angst as legitimate, or  —  dare I say it  —  valid. If being a teenager was understood to be a suffering unto itself, there would not be such a need to bring in outside explanations and justifications. Adults need to be upfront about how truly painful being a teenager can be, rather than sweeping it under the rug saying, “Yeah it sucks, but it gets better.” What does “it gets better in a few years” mean in the face of a teenager’s right now?

These are the kids who birthed the “you’re valid” phenomenon. When their feelings were dismissed by the adults in their lives, they turned to each other, assuring each other, “Yes, it’s reasonable that you feel the way you do. It makes sense.” Adults telling kids that their feelings are not real is  —  frankly  —  gaslighting. Yes, there’s a good chance that said feelings don’t actually mean what the kid thinks they mean. But kids do legitimately feel the way they feel.

Lastly, I want to say: Go easy on these kids. Try to criticize the systems rather than the kids. There is absolutely a solid argument to be made that internet-age, tumblr-based queer-identity culture is harmful, but the flipside of that coin is that these identities are coping mechanisms for hurting kids. Adults collecting oppression points to trade for online clout is a real phenomenon that should be criticized, but  —  while kids sometimes engage in this behavior as well  —  it’s more byproduct than driving motive with them. I truly believe most of them are primarily looking to legitimize and explain their deeply-felt pain. They’re just kids. It’s cringey, yes, but kids being cringey is normal, it’s to be expected. If you wait until they’re 20, a lot of them will right themselves all on their own. Remember to be compassionate, and remember that kids being cringey is not a moral shortcoming.

That Time I Was Dysphoric

A commonly told story regarding dysphoric teen girls goes like this: Gender is a fucked-up system, so of course girls feel uncomfortable with it. Wanting to escape this is a normal reaction.

…most little girls feel the same indignation and despair when they learn that the accidental conformation of their bodies condemns their tastes and aspirations; Colette Audry angrily discovered at the age of twelve that she could never become a sailor; the future woman naturally feels indignant about the limitations her sex imposes on her. The question is not why she rejects them; the real problem is rather to understand why she accepts them.

The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir, 1949

That’s certainly often true, but it’s not really my personal experience. My experience of dysphoria wasn’t about the social roles of gender. I’ve always been more-or-less gender-conforming. Not strictly gender-conforming, but the average amount of gender-conforming, in the normal pick-and-choose way. Gender-conforming enough that it was never really commented upon.

I was also remarkably sheltered from misogyny as a kid. Unlike many dysphoric teen girls, I’ve never been sexually abused. I was not getting inappropriately sexualized by men around me. I was not chided for my masculine interests.

When I was 14, and to a lesser extent when I was 13 and 15, I had sex dysphoria. It was of the loathing my body variety, rather than the dissociative variety. It was of a distinctly nonbinary nature — I never wanted a male body. (Not to be too gay, but male bodies are not desirable in any context.) But I didn’t want a female body either. The concept of “nonbinary dysphoria” overall significantly widens the parameters of what “dysphoria” even is, and dysphoria is already a fairly malleable concept.

I’m telling my story because I think it’s important to know that sex dysphoria can exist without gender dysphoria, and I haven’t seen anyone else talk about it. I also think it’s important because — under certain circumstances — sex dysphoria without gender dysphoria can be seen as more legitimate. “Clearly this isn’t just a social issue, so it must be innate and immovable!”

Carol: One of the “pure dysphorias” is when they talk about sex dysphoria. From what I’ve seen, the sex dysphoria tends to get a higher category than the social or more gender dysphoria. Do you guys have thoughts on that?

Mackenzie: I think part of the reason for that might be, I guess, obviously that the social stuff is more wiggly and people kind of can say like, “Well you know, there are masculine women and there are feminine men,” and stuff like that. So if you have social dysphoria, I think people will give some leeway for it to be affected by external things.

Post Gender Funkepisode 2, 2020

I was little when I first concluded that I was asexual. I was in 4th grade, and I was in the midst of my Percy Jackson/Greek mythology phase. I knew I didn’t like boys. I didn’t give much consideration to the possibility that I could like girls because I was a child and all the lesbians I knew were parent-aged. As a kid, adults just seemed too “other” for me to be like. I had never heard the word “asexual” then, and I didn’t think there were necessarily other people like me — I was just very convinced that this was the way I was. I was like Artemis.

In my late tweens or early teens, I found the word “asexual,” which lead me to the queer community on tumblr, dense with micro-labels and gender ideology. I never actually created a tumblr account — I think I intuitively knew that would be bad for me. But I lurked quite a bit, for a time.

I couldn’t really tell you how much I “bought into” queer theory. I was somewhat skeptical, and the inconsistences in the ideology bothered me. But I didn’t entirely write it off either. After the suicide of MtF teen Leelah Alcorn in 2014, I remember signing a petition and donating $15 to support “Leelah’s Law,” to ban gender conversion therapy.

I thought non-binary was kinda stupid, but I also read people’s descriptions of being non-binary and I thought, “Oh shit… that kinda sounds like me.” In particular, since I was asexual and aromantic, I remember at one point thinking that I “might as well” be agender too. Round out the trifecta. [Insert “triple-A battery” pun here.]

I didn’t want to draw attention to myself. I wasn’t interested in pronoun games, but then again, “Enbies who go by she/her are totally valid! they’re just words, and you should do whatever makes you most comfortable! uwu!” I didn’t want to look like a boy, or even particularly androgynous, but then, “Enbies can look however they want! They’re just clothes, they don’t mean anything!” I didn’t “feel like a girl,” and that was the core requirement, according to many; everything else was just window dressing.

And then there were the others, who said dysphoria was the core requirement. The “tucute” version was a bit too woo-woo for me, even then, and the transmedicalist side seemed more grounded. I always remember a YouTube video where a trans man says something along the lines of, “If it’s not broke, don’t fix it. If you don’t mind your body, don’t alter it.” And I did feel distress about my body. I did not refer to it as “dysphoria,” even in my own head — which I think is significant and may have made it easier to overcome. But it certainly could be described as dysphoria, and I was very aware of that.

If I could’ve snapped my fingers and had puberty blockers and surgery, I would have. I had no real intention of actually getting these things — the prospect of talking to my parents or doctors about it was daunting and humiliating. I did not want it enough to do the things necessary to make it happen, but I did want them. If physical transition had been easily accessible to me, I would have gone for it.

It was during this time that I started going by the androgynous nickname Mo, which I still use and like to this day.

I never really adopted a nonbinary identity. I didn’t want to be nonbinary (even then, I had some idea of how annoying it was) and so it was never part of how I conceptualized myself. I never came out to anyone. I was shy, and didn’t want attention. But I was dabbling with the idea that I might be nonbinary. I knew that if I ever was to try to explain this to someone, I would have to use the language of gender ideology, even though that wasn’t quite the language I used in my own mind.

Basis

My dysphoria was, first and foremostly, a reaction to puberty.

I did not want to go through puberty. My body up and changed on me without my consent, and it felt like a betrayal, like I was losing myself. I wanted a body more like my prepubescent body. I wanted a de-sexed body.

(To be fair, I should mention that I did not hit puberty unduly early. I got my period on my 13-and-a-halfth birthday. Regarding my development in regard to that of my peers, I was in the slower half. It was not premature in any objective sense.)

Beyond the physicality of it, there was also a mental component to my Peter Pan Syndrome. The teen years are a weird time for everyone, no longer a child and not an adult yet either. Real genders distinguish based on age: women vs girl, man vs boy. But nonbinary is ageless.

From a naturalist point of view, physical maturity — aka starting to actually look your sex — is the defining feature of becoming an adult. But the process of puberty is traumatic for most. If your body is done with puberty by the time you’re about 15, and yet your brain is not fully developed until you’re 25, it’s easy to see how that could feed into the idea that you’re “wrong in your body,” or that “your brain and body don’t match.” At 13 and 14 I felt too young for my body; at 17 and 18 I felt too old for the way society treated me.

There is also inherent alien or transhumanist quality to the concept of “nonbinary”, in that the ideal or sought-after state is not one which actually exists for human beings. While hermaphroditism, parthenogenesis, and other similarly exotic reproductive systems do exist, they do not exist in any mammals. In humans — and in all species even remotely similar to us — sex is exactly what you think it is: classic male-female. Thus, nonbinary contains an inherent desire to escape the bounds of humanity. I felt “other,” impossibly different from everyone else. I could well believe that “otherness” made me somehow not-really-human. And I wanted to enact this otherness onto my body.

Menstruation

My period started on my 13-and-a-halfth birthday, in July, the summer between 7th and 8th grade. In the year that followed, thought about lots of different ways to get rid of it. I read online about how to use birth control pills to stop your period. I read online about someone who was developing menstrual suppressant pills, which worked kind of like birth control pills did, but their explicit goal was to stop periods. I thought about surgically getting my reproductive system removed.

I looked into many different thinks, but ultimately they all required getting my hands on something, and didn’t yet have my own bank account so I couldn’t order stuff online. And so anorexia won out as the way to stop my period, because it was DIY.

Disordered Eating

When I was in 8th grade, I read an article about a pair of twin sisters, one of whom had serious anorexia in her teen years and was left waifish and infertile by it, in sharp contrast with her sister, who ate and developed normally. The second sister created a sort of control group, and served to highlight the effects of anorexia on her sister.

Because I have only had one period as a result of the anorexia, my fertility is damaged beyond repair … Ironically, I look at Lisa’s curvy figure and I think she looks beautiful. She has a proper bust while my dieting meant my breasts never developed properly.

“Twins at war”, 2009

Inspired by that story, I began a bout of anorexia, attempting to invoke those same effects on myself. Without hormone blockers, this seemed like a DIY way to dampen the effects of my hormones on my body.

I wanted to starve my period away, curb the development of my hips and breasts. The part that really interested me was that the woman in the article still had these effects — even years later, after having recovered from her anorexia. I thought if I could just stave myself for a few years now, I could have the effects I wanted for life. That seemed like a reasonable trade.

I never really took much issue with my breasts. I’m relatively small-tittied to this day, and I was even smaller back then. I definitely didn’t want them to get any bigger, and at this point I didn’t know how big they would get if left to their own devices. But I didn’t wish I was as a flat as a boy either. As long as I could curb my development and freeze things where they were, I was fine with that. I never tried binding.

My hips, however, I hated. This was severely exacerbated by the fact that — at this time in my life — I would sometimes crawl through the doggy door at my house, and my hips just barely fit. This consistent measuring of them against a fixed object for scale was probably the worst thing I could have done. I was hyper-aware of the fact that someday very soon I would not be able to fit through the door, and this loomed heavy and ominous in my future.

Back then, I knew relatively little about disordered eating. I had a single, very narrow idea of what disordered eating was about: It was something that stupid straight girls did because they bought into toxic societal beauty standards.

I looked up anorexia online. I read articles cautioning girls away from disordered eating by insisting that, “There’s nothing sexy about anorexia.” I thought, “Excellent — that’s exactly what I want then.”

I did not think starving myself would make me attractive, and I didn’t want to be attractive. Earth goddesses are usually depicted as voluptuous; they’re sensual; they’re fertile. “Real women have curves,” and I didn’t want to be a “real woman.” I wanted to be an angel or fairy — not unfeminine, but ethereal, alien, waifish, sexless.

I viewed my body as a trope, as a canvas for literary symbolism, rather than a flesh and blood thing to live in. (I am too much a writer, sometimes. This is a recurring motif throughout my life.)

I was aware that there was a small population of anorexic boys. I remember googling, trying to find out what motivated them psychologically. I wondered if my paradigm and motivations were more in line with theirs. This would’ve been circa 2013, and I found very little online about anorexic boys. What little I did find essentially said, “Boys face societal body image pressures too. They’re also trying to be fit and hot.”

At the time, I was unaware that disordered eating is extremely common among the trans population. Nowadays, I know that their patterns of disordered eating were the paradigm I was looking for. My disordered eating was completely in keeping with those patterns and thoughts. It’s about gaining control over a disobedient body, enforcing your will over it, perhaps even punishing it. The goal isn’t to be hot, but to be androgynous.

A couple years before this, my family had gotten our first dog. I was taught was that if a dog nips at a person, or steals food, you need to assert your dominance. The way to do this was to wrestle the dog to the ground, pin them on their back, and growl in their face. Then, after a minute, you can let them up, and they will be polite and docile now that they understand you’re in charge. I imagined my anorexia as a metaphorical equivalent; wresting my body to the ground and asserting my dominance over it. I hoped that — like with dogs — once I got the message across, it would not be necessary anymore, that I could let it up, and it would be well-behaved and chastened.

My view of disordered eating as “feminine” also played a role in which techniques I used. I treated my anorexia as an test of endurance, in contrast to the intricate, detail-focused anorexia I’ve heard other people describe. For example, I never counted calories, and I didn’t pay overmuch attention to which foods I did eat — I would just fast. I never ate lunch, and other meals might be small. Talking about calories seemed like a stupid straight girl thing, while enduring hunger seemed tough and strong. I could endure a famine and survive it. Calories felt capitalistic and artificial, while good old-fashioned hunger seemed naturalistic.

If I had known there were others who engaged in disordered eating like mine, I would very likely have gone full steam ahead. But I didn’t know. The only image I had of anorexia was stupid straight girls trying to be barbies. I was not that. In my self-conceptualization, I was aggressively not that — I was the antithesis of that. So why, then, was I engaging in the same behaviors as them? Ultimately, this really held me back and kept me from going too far with it.

I managed to starve my period away once. I was proud, I felt victorious — but it also frightened me. It started to feel too real. I’d been anticipating stomach pain, and I was prepared for that — I told myself I was strong enough to endure pain. But what I wasn’t expecting was the mental fog that comes with low blood sugar. Feeling like that constantly was starting to take its toll on me. I started to wonder if it was worth it to feel like that all month long in order to avoid my period, which was only a sometimes issue.

And so — between the mental fog and not wanting to act like a stupid straight girl — I decided to stop. In all, from beginning to end, the whole anorexia thing ran its course in something under a year.

Hormones

I was told by the trans internet that hormone blockers were completely harmless. I suspect the people telling me this genuinely believed it, but now that it’s coming out how dangerous hormone blockers actually are, this has become one of the most unsettling parts of this story. Hormone blockers are widely given to dysphoric teens, despite this being an off-label — aka untested — usage of the drug. This was something I might actually have been able to get my hands on, if I’d tried.

I wanted a hysterectomy, to be rid of periods — I already planned to adopt my kids, and had since I was like 7, because the idea of childbirth frightened me from a young age. I knew nothing of the risks associated with hysterectomies. For example: I had never heard of pelvic prolapse. To be fair, I wasn’t read up on the medical logistics of it in any manner. I think I thought a hysterectomy included removing the ovaries (oophorectomy) too? I don’t know if I was entirely aware that getting an oophorectomy would cause what is known as “surgical menopause.” I think I may have known, and liked the idea — I wanted hormone blockers, after all, and this was another way to get that same effect. I certainly wasn’t aware of the health risks associated with that, such as an increased risk of osteoporosis and dementia.

Bottom Dysphoria

Along with not wanting internal organs or a vaginal opening, I also didn’t want a vulva. I actually wanted that more, because at least my internal organs were out of sight, out of mind. Society’s general disgust with vulvas, combined with thinking I was asexual, created the conclusion that it was gross and useless. I wanted to be smooth like a Ken doll, with just a urethra.

Nowadays, the term for this would be “gender nullification surgery” although I don’t recall that being a term circa 2013/2014. I do, however, I remember reading on tumblr once that a nonbinary bottom surgery had been done on someone somewhere. (I don’t remember what that surgery actually entailed.) To my mind, the takeaway was that — while such procedures were uncommon, and find a doctor willing to perform one would be difficult — it did exist, and it was on the table, at least in theory.

I was fairly certain I would never get bottom surgery myself, because the idea of surgery frightened me in general, and the idea of surgeons seeing me naked was appalling. But I thought about it, fantasized about it.

I wondered how feasible it would be to cut off my labia minora myself using an x-acto knife. I wondered if I could stand the pain, if I would be able to follow through on it once I started. I imagined doing it in sections: cut a centimeter, let that heal, then do the next centimeter. Maybe that would make it easier to endure.

Risk Factors

Lisa Littman’s 2018 study, which coined the term ROGD (rapid onset gender dysphoria) describes common traits among teenagers who develop a transgender identity “out of the blue” after a period of increased internet usage. Anecdotal evidence from detransitioners backs this up: there seems to be a common mold for these kids, namely, high achieving, emotionally sensitive, socially awkward girls. I fit that mold to a T.

Gifted student

47.4% of Littman’s participants were “gifted” students. So was I; I was in the GATE program.

ADHD

I have ADHD, which 14.8% of Littman’s participants also have. Of suspected risk factors, ADHD is among the most frequently mentioned by detrans people. Specifically, it’s easy to see how the ability to hyperfocus (which is found both in ADHD and autism) would facilitate it.

…when you get really into a hobby, or really into researching something, for like two or three years or like a couple months, and then you switch to something else after. I’ve done that so much. With arts and crafts I can do like in a timeline. Like I was really into like knitting when I was a kid, and then I was into sewing, and then I was obsessed with origami for like two years, and then I was doing pin back buttons for like three years and photoshop at the same time, and then I was really into embroidery for like two years. I can literally track my obsessions as I go. And I wonder now, looking back, if there was just certain times in my life when my obsession was trans stuff.

Ben, Post Gender Funk, episode 3, 2020

ADHD is also under-diagnosed in girls, and I suspect this may be another factor. A documentable difference in how the brain handles neurotransmitters + that condition being associated with males… it’s easy to see how that might connect to the idea that an ADHD female has a “male brain.”

Around that same time I’ve been diagnosed with ADHD … I remember seeing an article about how ADHD was being used to discriminate against little boys who are just behaving the way normal, healthy little boys behave, because that’s the way their brains are. And I remember thinking, “Maybe I have a boy’s brain.”

Laura Reynolds, Benjamin Boyce interview, 2020

OCD

I suffered from OCD for a few years as a result of bullying in middle school, beginning slightly before my dysphoric window and ending slightly after my dysphoria subsided. 12.3% of Littman’s participants had OCD. Beyond general comorbidity, it has been theorized that OCD and dysphoria are linked in their obsessive character, and the quieting of anxiety and discomfort by strictly controlling yourself and your immediate environment.

Autism

Lastly, autism also seems to have some link (12.3% of Littman’s participants). Just last month, I was helping my dad organize some old stuff of his, and we came across a box of self-help books. Among them were a few books about Asperger’s (aka mild autism) in girls, and what parents can do to help. Seeing them, I asked my dad, “Did you think I had Asperger’s when I was in late middle school/early high school?” I knew, even without asking, that they would’ve been from that time period.

He said he and my mom considered the possibility for a while, consulted a professional at one point, and eventually ruled it out.

What I find really interesting about this story is that even though I don’t actually have autism, when I had dysphoria I was exhibiting autism-like behaviors anyways. I don’t really know what to make of this, but I think it’s worth noting in this account.

Gender

My dysphoria was mostly about sex, rather than gender, but it didn’t exist in a genderless vacuum.

I was able to recognize that the bits of gender I was most bothered by were the pieces that involved — or were somehow related to, or based on — heterosexuality. Sometimes I started to dip into “not like other girls” territory, but when I did, I conceptualized the “other girls” who I was dissimilar to as straight girls.

This was, of course, unfair and judgmental of me. More than anything, this idea of straight girls as a monolithic group is simply inaccurate. I was especially oblivious to how straight girls — more than anyone! — have problems with the way heterosexuality gets framed by gender.

But it did allow me a way to divorce from parts of women’s social role, without throwing the baby out with the bathwater. And I think that was valuable to me at the time.

Aftermath

I stayed off tumblr, and it ceased to be something I thought about much. I got on with the business of living. I slowly settled back into my body over the next few years. I didn’t like my body, but I didn’t think about it enough to have strong feelings like hate about it either.

I wore boy’s jeans and oversized shirts, which hid my body. I still thought I was asexual for many more years. I thought no one else would ever see my body but me, and so ultimately it didn’t matter very much. My body was just for me to live in; it didn’t need to be anything for anyone else. I didn’t think about how other people would perceive it, because they weren’t going to perceive it.

And then one morning when I was 18, I was getting dressed when I caught a glimpse of my naked body in the mirror and was blind-sighted by the thought, “Oh. I’m actually kind of beautiful.”

I think my dysphoria cast a shadow on my sexuality as well. I had to get to a point where I didn’t hate my female body before I could realize I didn’t hate other people’s female bodies either.

These days, my body and I are on animable terms.

I’m glad I didn’t make myself infertile, because nowadays, I’d like to have one of each: a biological child and an adopted child.

In many ways, I don’t think what I experienced was “classic dysphoria,” the sort that is more often found in butch women. That kind of dysphoria is often talked about as something more persistent, something that you can manage and learn to live with, but may last a lifetime. In contrast, mine was a relatively short-lived thing that happened as a direct response to puberty, and has since gone away entirely. Were I writing the DSM, I don’t think I would consider these two phenomena to be the same thing. But in the language of “dysphoria” they are the same, which is the point: dysphoria is a very loosely-defined and amorphous concept that does not always come from the same place, and is not always indicative of the same thing.

Misogyny is not the only cause of dysphoria. Mine was primarily rooted in the trauma of puberty, and understanding the world through narrative tropes. And it was still a dysfunction, and not something I should’ve made life-changing decisions on the basis of.

Re: Disordered Eating

While writing this account, I tried multiple times to find that article about the twin sisters which had such a large hand in inspiring my disordered eating when I was 14. At great length, I found it again. I then searched their names (Louise and Lisa Wrightson) and found a page on JustGiving.com from 2017, where a friend of Louise’s was raising money to donate to Beat, the UK’s eating disorder charity.

Over the years Louise suffered as the disease claimed her. She lived with a number of awful symptoms caused by the disease. I always tried to make light of it and would often take the piss out of her. … Louise died on her 36th birthday. She was so frail at the end. I know I was lucky to be able to see her and say goodbye and I’m so thankful I could spend time with her.

“Remembering Louise Wrightson” by Kathryn Common, 2017

This shakes me. This woman’s story was where I got the idea that I could be anorexic for a while, mess up my body in the ways I wanted, then go back to eating normally and be fine for the rest of my life.

But that wasn’t possible for her; it killed her.

As a teenager, I’d thought Louise was recovered by the time the first article was written. Looking back at the article now, I see that wasn’t exactly true. It said, “she is recovering but is still too unwell for work.” The article didn’t do anything wrong, or romanticize anorexia; I was just a really messed-up kid when I saw it. But looking back on it now, I’m reeling.

That Time I Was Aro Ace

Beanies I knitted during that time,
bracelets I made, and rings I bought.

I identified as full-on 100% aromantic asexual for a decade, from the time I was 9 or 10, until I was 19. I’m now 21, and the current lead theory in the field is that I’m a lesbian (although more research is needed, and finding a girlfriend is hard).

The online asexual community is often cited as a prime example of “the queer community gone awry” — LGBT conceptualism fractured to the point where it’s meaningless. And that’s true. Between demisexuality, graysexuality, and the split attraction model, there’s something for virtually anyone to latch onto.

The split-attraction model holds that romantic and sexual attraction are distinct, and can follow different sex patterns. So you get things like “asexual heteroromantic” and “bisexual homoromantic.” The split attraction model isn’t something that a researcher came up with to describe their findings, such as the Kinsey Scale. It’s not a concept a philosopher put forth in an essay, complete with an explanation and defense. This framework is literally just something someone on the internet came up with, and then other people were like, “Sure, ok,” and started using. The only evidence than posits this is a useful or accurate way to describe people’s patterns of attraction is anecdotal accounts of “this works for me,” and for each of those, there is another anecdote from someone who finds this framework maladaptive.

I have yet to hear a definition of “romantic attraction” that is entirely removed from eroticism, and yet is also meaningfully distinct from platonic fondness. This is all made weirder by the fact that these terms are being defined by “a-spectrum” people who freely admit they don’t experience these things and thus don’t really know what they’re like. Yet, if you ask “normal” (“allo”) people, they tend to agree that eroticism — not necessarily sex itself, but eroticism more broadly — is the delineating factor between romantic and platonic relationships.

The word “romantic” comes from the literary genre of Romanticism (aka Lord Byron and co.) and originally meant, “Like those stories.” Even today, “romance” is more as much genre/trope/vibe/aesthetic than emotion. While passionate relationships transcend time and culture, there is an argument to be made that the specifics of our modern conceptualization of “romantic relationships” are culturally bound.

So ace spaces take this very murky concept of “romantic attraction”, but then somehow “romantic attraction” and “sexual attraction” get defined very narrowly. For example, “sexual attraction” gets defined as “you full-on literally want to have sex with this person.” This rigid template of “conventional attraction” does not allow room for range of experiences, or poetics. Thus, with the bar for “normal” raised so high, the large number of people who don’t meet it get swept into “the asexual spectrum.” Most of this spectrum deals with the ways people’s subjective experiences of attraction vary, and do not meet this perceived norm. A person’s qualitative experiences of attraction are part of sexuality, not asexuality — asexuals straight up aren’t attracted to people!

I want to cut a fine line here: there’s a lot wrong with the asexual community, but I suspect actual aromantic asexuals do exist, albeit rarely. It makes sense that they would exist; it is the logical fourth sexual orientation. There are 2 sexes, each of which a person can be into, or not. We know from bisexuality that your attraction to one sex isn’t somehow inversely linked to your attraction to the other.

females yesfemales no
males yesbisexualfemale heterosexual
male homosexual
males nomale heterosexual
female homosexual
asexual

These real asexuals are not “basically straight.” It is major and life-shaping to lack the cross-sex attraction that is de facto expected of everyone. I think there is potential for understanding and solidarity between gay and asexual people around this shared experience.

As for people who identify as asexual because they are disinterested in the act of sex, rather than disinterested in either of the two sexes — I believe their experiences legitimately exist. These people may have relationship troubles because of it, and they might benefit from online support groups to talk about it. But it’s not a sexual orientation. Sexual orientation is about which sexes you are and aren’t attracted to; it’s not about sex acts. (Straight men getting pegged by their girlfriends is still heterosexual.) These people with disinterest in sex — yet who are still attracted to one sex or the other or both — are part of the spectrum of how sexuality can present within sexual orientation.

And then there are “demisexuals” and “gray-aces”. Regarding them, I think the overuse of concept of asexuality and its derivatives are an understandable reaction to living in an oversexed world. People mock 13-year-olds for self-IDing as asexual, but it’s not a bad thing that 13-year-old can identify and articulate that they are not sexual, even if this is a byproduct of their youth rather than a lifelong state. If fact — given the pervasive over-sexualization of children far too young — it might actually be a healthy stance under the circumstances. The overuse of asexuality is a rather poor reaction, yes, but it is not a reaction to nothing.

My Experience

I concluded I was asexual when I was 9 or 10 years old. It wasn’t even tumblr’s fault.

In 4th grade, I was in the midst of my Percy Jackson/Greek mythology phase. And so — like every lesbian and bi girl for the past several thousand years — I had a thing for Artemis, goddess of the moon and the hunt, eternal maiden.

I had never heard of asexuality, yet I very much believed myself to be that way. I thought I was a one-off fluke of nature, but I was quite sure this was how I was. I was like Artemis. In my head I called in “blank” — like if given a form and asked to check off the sexes I was into, I’d leave it blank. I knew I wasn’t interested in boys. And I assumed I didn’t like girls, because… I mean, if I did, I’d just know, right?

I actually had a huge crush on my best friend at the time. But for elementary school girls, hyper-intense, obsessive relationships between best friends were the norm, so I didn’t think twice about it. Looking back though, I do find it relevant that I firmly concluded I was not straight during the same time I had my first big crush on a girl. Also, I thought that she wasn’t into guys either, so I was really surprised when she had a crush one the following year. What? She was as into Artemis as I was! (Also, she had huge gay energy, even that young. I didn’t just imagine it — I’ve had other childhood friends verify it, they saw it too.)

I was probably 13 when I found the asexual community online. I was briefly delighted to be something — “asexual!” — rather than nothing — “blank.” But this soon turned to annoyance and disenchantment as I learned about the split attraction model. Within the framework, my aromanticism was more significant to me than my asexuality. Of course I wasn’t sexual — no one my age was, really. I didn’t have crushes, though, and that was the usual thing.

But in the online asexual community, most people were not aromantic. These people who were supposedly like me were not, really, much like me. They had crushes; they dated; they got married. They functioned as “normal” in society. They were not eternal spinsters, not discernibly “other.”

I briefly questioned my sexuality again at that point, only to conclude, “Yup, I was right the first time.” In particular, I took the fact that I had independently come up with the concept of aromantic asexuality and understood myself to be that way even before I was exposed to the online community, as surefire evidence that I was genuinely asexual, and that this was not a socially influenced thing.

Around this time there were a handful of adults online — or perhaps just older teens — expressing sentiments along the lines of, “You’re so young! You shouldn’t be labeling yourself so soon!” I resented the patronizing aspect of this, but I did kind of understand what they were saying. Where they lost me was this: “Logistically, what am I supposed to do about it? I know myself to be this way. Am I just supposed to pretend I don’t know? Feign that I’m less self-aware than I am? Not telling people that I’m asexual would be easy enough, but how am I supposed to actually not conceptualize myself that way?” Replacing one idea with another is easy enough, but trading a conclusion for the vagueness of “I dunno and I’m not going to worry about it” is quite difficult. This is doubly true for kids like us, who have an urge to “solve” ourselves like a rubik’s cube.

My asexuality was a good enough explanation that I proceeded with it throughout my teen years. There’s a popular stereotype of teenagers as flooded with hormones and ravenously horny, and that may be true in some cases. But teenagers are also very commonly depressed, and depression has been known to put a damper on people’s sexuality. The hallmark of depression is disinterest in things you’d usually be interested in. I also think that with lesbianism — more so than with any other orientation — the lines between crushes and friends get blurry, given the pseudo-romantic nature of close female friendship in our society.

Then at age 19, my best friend at the time came out as lesbian. She started talking about how she wanted a girlfriend. I was like, “You know — come to mention it — I think I kinda do too?” I was blindsided by the realization. My usual joke about this goes, “I think the only person who was surprised to learn I was gay was me. But I was floored!

I may have realized I was a lesbian sooner had I never believed I was asexual, but — as things stand — I wasn’t that stalled. I realized it after one year of college, the same year that both of my childhood best friends did as well. I was well within a normal timeline. And it’s not like I would’ve had any dating prospects in my teen years anyway, so I didn’t miss out on anything there.

Compared to the other rabbit holes I could have fallen down, I think asexuality was by far healthier than many. I could’ve gotten into cutting, or disordered eating, or trans ideology, which would’ve given form and framework to the hatred of my body I felt in the wake of puberty. Rather than settling back into my body over the next few years, as I did, and letting that hatred dissipate, I could’ve doubled down on it, cultivating and shaping it like a bonsai tree with the encouragement of online peers. I could’ve done serious lasting harm to my body, and I’m grateful I didn’t.

Beyond merely being a placeholder that kept me from getting into worse things, I think that my mistaken asexuality was actively good for me in some ways. The more I hear other women talk about their struggles with self-conceptualization, but more I suspect that believing I was asexual during my formative years instilled in me that I am not a sex object, and I am not a coming-of-age movie that hinges on romance.

The idea of non-attraction as not just possible, but likely, normal, to be expected — that’s huge. I default to saying “no” rather than defaulting to saying “yes.” It’s an opt-in, not an opt-out. Asexuality instilled in me that you don’t have to go through the motions. You don’t have to date just because that’s just what people do. You don’t have to feign attraction to someone you’re not really into. You don’t have to try to talk yourself into it. You don’t have to be open to anything — not even in theory.

In my mid-to-late teen years — once puberty was past — I had occasional thoughts of wishing my body was different, but these were always passing thoughts. I never dwelled on it much, because ultimately it didn’t matter. No one else would ever see my body anyways. It’d be nice if I was pretty in an unearthly, fae-like way just For The Aesthetic™. But there was no real loss if I wasn’t. There was no utility to it; I didn’t need to be desirable. And even though that’s a logic-based counterargument to an emotional response, it was surprisingly effective. Today I have a better relationship with my body than many of my peers.

Singlehood

For me, the biggest part of my sojourn in asexuality is that I spent a decade thinking I would be single all my life. Eventually all my friends would pair up and get married, and I would be left all alone. I don’t know how to replicate the experience of truly believing this is your lot in life to someone who’s never been through that. I cannot know what it’s like to actually be asexual, since I was wrong in that assessment, but I do know the kind of questions that genuinely thinking you are for a long time forces you to reckon with.

In practice, “asexual discourse” in nonsense, concerned with dissecting the minutia of identity politics. But in theory — if the word “asexual” was not watered down until it was meaningless — asexual discourse could consist of interesting and overdue discussions of unpopular topics such as lifelong singlehood and celibacy.

Modern singlehood is usually accompanied by implications of a lifestyle of casual dating or hookups. Celibacy is an antiquated relic of a bygone age, given no place in modern conversation. In most circles, being single is framed as a season of one’s life — ultimately a passing thing. The idea of romantic fate is popular, even among people who don’t believe in destiny in any other context. “There’s someone out there for everyone!” But we all know that’s not necessarily true. There are people who never marry: some by choice, and some because they never find a suitable spouse. This could happen to you, and that’s a possibility that many people seem extremely unconformable with sitting with.

I argue that the plight of asexuals (and other people who are single long-term) is not historic, but rather modern. In a multi-generational family living under one roof, there’s a place for a maiden aunt. In both the West and East, there is a long tradition of celibate religious orders. The past had a place for them. But in the world of today, single adults are desperately alone.

The modern world is in constant motion, spinning faster and faster. Families are often dispersed, siblings are scattered across continents, and we uproot ourselves for new jobs more easily than a plant is repotted. We have hundreds of virtual “friends” but no one we can ask to feed the cat. We are a lot more free than our grandparents were, but also more disconnected. In our desperate search for a safe harbor, where are we to dock? Marital intimacy has become the sovereign antidote for lives of growing atomization.

The State of Affairs by Esther Perel

This is something that asexuals have to confront. Non-asexuals would benefit from doing the same.

I wouldn’t say asexuals are more persecuted than homosexuals or bisexuals, but they are absolutely more alienated by society. I would also think they’re more radical. Same-sex couples aren’t really that different from cross-sex couples; it just requires a new coat of paint. Asexuals, however, challenge the entire foundation.

Aphobia isn’t a “thing” — I don’t think anyone has a specific prejudice against asexuals. But amatonormativity most definitely is real.

I call this disproportionate focus on marital and amorous love relationships as special sites of value, and the assumption that romantic love is a universal goal, ‘amatonormativity’: This consists in the assumptions that a central, exclusive, amorous relationship is normal for humans, in that it is a universally shared goal, and that such a relationship is normative, in that it should be aimed at in preference to other relationship types. […] Amatonormativity prompts the sacrifice of other relationships to romantic love and marriage and relegates friendship and solitudinousness to cultural invisibility.

Minimizing Marriage by Elizabeth Brake